Our brains have billions of neurons, each capable of around 10,000 connections. With that capacity for networking, there is effectively an infinite number of possible connectivity patterns — or thoughts, as we call them.

The reader may find our pieces in some ways repetitious, with subtle variation or differing nuance. We recognize this. But that same reader should acknowledge we often surround ourselves with like-mindedness, not because we are closed, but because there is comfort in the mundane. As long as our positions are not fixed and we are open to challenge, our conclusions will often be similar.

If the number of possible thoughts is infinite, then the difference between two adjacent thoughts is infinitely small. Does that make one less viable than the other?